Schenck v. US question Citizens United v. FEC clause Schenck v. US impact New York Times v. US question

7:2 for Tinker, symbolic speech is protected under freedom of speech, students have free speech rights Extended the right of privacy to a woman's right to an abortion During World War I, Schenck, secretary of the socialist party, mailed a pamphlets to draftees declaring that the Thirteenth Amendment prohibition against involuntary servitude meant that the draft was unconstitutional. He was charged with violation of the Espionage Act and sued saying that he was just exercising free speech (1919) For religious reasons Amish families refused to send their children to high school citing a religious exemption, violating a Wisconsin law and were fined. They sued the state for violating their freedom of religion (1972)

Schenck v. US clause Shaw v. Reno facts Brown v. Board of Education ruling Tinker v. Des Moines ruling

Did Schenck's conviction under the Espionage Act for criticizing the draft violate his freedom of speech? 1st Amendment Establishment Clause 14th amendment equal protection clause religion trumps schooling

limited commerce clause, lessened federal power unanimous for US, Schenck's encouragement of draft dodging was a clear and present danger 9:0 for Brown, school segregation violates the equal protection clause 7:0 for Yoder, forcing people to go to school despite a religious disagreement violated the free exercise clause