McCulloch v. Maryland impactestablished supremacy of federal laws and the implied powers of congress
Frozen!
Frozen!
Boost!
Boost!
Marbury v. Madison ruling4:0 for Marbury, kinda. Marbury does deserve his commision, but SCOTUS shouldn't have heard the case first
US v. Lopez impactlimited commerce clause, lessened federal power
Schenck v. US ruling
New York Times v. US facts
Baker v. Carr impact
Baker v. Carr ruling
Brown v. Board of Education facts
Brown v. Board of Education question
Engel v. Vitale factsPublic schools in New York began the school day by having students to recite a nondenominational prayer each morning. Engel, a parent at the school sued the district for violating the establishment clause (1962)
Wisconsin v. Yoder clause1st Amendment Free Exercise Clause
Marbury v. Madison clauseappellate jurisdiction clause of Article III
Schenck v. US questionDid Schenck's conviction under the Espionage Act for criticizing the draft violate his freedom of speech?
1st amendment freedom of press
Engel v. Vitale questionDoes the reading of a nondenominational prayer at the start of the school day violate the establishment clause of the First Amendment?
US v. Lopez facts
Gideon v. Wainwright question
Wisconsin v. Yoder ruling
Roe v. Wade clause
Citizens United v. FEC factsBCRA law banned Citizens United from showing an ad they made casting Hilary Clinton in a negative light calling it "electioneering" and thus against the BCRA. Citizens United appealed that the ad fell under their right to free speech and thus the BCRA was unconstitutional (2010)
7:2 for Tinker, symbolic speech is protected under freedom of speech, students have free speech rights
McDonald v. Chicago ruling
New York Times v. US ruling6:3 for NYTimes, except in the case of a Clear and Present danger the US government does not have the power of prior restraint over the press
Tinker v. Des Moines impactstudents have free speech rights, symbolic speech is speech and protected
Citizens United v. FEC impactused as precedent to declare the cap on campaign funding unconstitutional, now money=free speech
McDonald v. Chicago factsThe Chicago system for obtaining gun permits was so annoying that it was almost impossible to obtain one. McDonald sued Chicago for violating his 2nd amendment rights (2010)
US v. Lopez clauseCommerce Clause
Does banning the wearing of armbands in public school, as a form of protest, violate the students' freedom of speech guaranteed in the First Amendment?
New York Times v. US question
Shaw v. Reno ruling5:4 for Shaw, factoring race into redistricting is unconstitutional
In Tennessee district boundaries were not being redrawn despite unequal spread of voters. Baker, a Tennessee citizen, sued on the grounds that the district lines made rural votes worth more than urban ones. (1962)
McCulloch v. Maryland impact
establishes One Person-One Vote principle which expands the rights of minorities
Tinker v. Des Moines clause
Marbury v. Madison ruling
Schenck v. US questionDid Schenck's conviction under the Espionage Act for criticizing the draft violate his freedom of speech?
Gideon v. Wainwright clause6th amendment, right to an attorney
School sponsorship of religious activities violates the establishment clause
Boost!
Boost!
US v. Lopez impact
Baker v. Carr clause14th amendment equal protection clause
Roe v. Wade ruling
New York Times v. US question
Engel v. Vitale questionDoes the reading of a nondenominational prayer at the start of the school day violate the establishment clause of the First Amendment?
Wisconsin v. Yoder clause1st Amendment Free Exercise Clause
Boost!
Boost!
7:2 for Tinker, symbolic speech is protected under freedom of speech, students have free speech rights
Roe v. Wade factsRoe, a Texas resident, sought to terminate her pregnancy by abortion. Texas law prohibited abortions except to save the pregnant woman's life, Roe sued "on behalf of all women" (1973)
Roe v. Wade clausea bunch, 9th implied rights, 14th due process especially
Frozen!
Frozen!
Schenck v. US factsDuring World War I, Schenck, secretary of the socialist party, mailed a pamphlets to draftees declaring that the Thirteenth Amendment prohibition against involuntary servitude meant that the draft was unconstitutional. He was charged with violation of the Espionage Act and sued saying that he was just exercising free speech (1919)
used as precedent to declare the cap on campaign funding unconstitutional, now money=free speech
Shaw v. Reno impactclaims of racial redistricting must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny. laws that results in classification by race must have a compelling state interest or a clear 14th amendment violation
Baker v. Carr question
Marbury v. Madison ruling4:0 for Marbury, kinda. Marbury does deserve his commision, but SCOTUS shouldn't have heard the case first
Brown v. Board of Education clause14th amendment equal protection clause
Frozen!
Frozen!
US v. Lopez ruling5:4 for Lopez, the state cannot regulate guns on school property under the commerce clause
Does the 2nd Amendment apply to state and local governments through the 14th Amendment's due process clause and thus prevent states from banning gun ownership?
Baker v. Carr ruling
Shaw v. Reno factsIn an attempt to create an additional legislative district with a majority of African-American voters, the state of North Carolina created a district connecting pockets of minority voters by nothing more than the width of the freeway. Shaw, a republican from NC, sued the US Attorney General who had forced the changes on 14th amendment violations (1993)
US v. Lopez factsLopez, a senior brought a gun to his public high school, illegal under the federal Gun Free School Zones Act. He was arrested and tried in federal court. He sued saying that regulation on state property (schools) was state business. (1995)
Shaw v. Reno ruling5:4 for Shaw, factoring race into redistricting is unconstitutional
New York Times v. US factsThe Nixon administration attempted to prevent several newspapers from publishing materials belonging to a classified Defense Department study, known as the Pentagon Papers, detailing US actions in Vietnam. The president argued that prior restraint was necessary to protect national security. NYTimes sued on 1st amendment grounds (1971)