Roe v. Wade questionDoes the Texas laws banning abortions violate the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment and a woman's constitutional right to an abortion?
Frozen!
Frozen!
Boost!
Boost!
established supremacy of federal laws and the implied powers of congress
Brown v. Board of Education clause
Schenck v. US clause
Tinker v. Des Moines question
Shaw v. Reno impactclaims of racial redistricting must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny. laws that results in classification by race must have a compelling state interest or a clear 14th amendment violation
Citizens United v. FEC impactused as precedent to declare the cap on campaign funding unconstitutional, now money=free speech
Gideon v. Wainwright impact
Baker v. Carr clause14th amendment equal protection clause
Schenck v. US questionDid Schenck's conviction under the Espionage Act for criticizing the draft violate his freedom of speech?
McDonald v. Chicago clause2nd Amendment right to bear arms, 14th amendment due process clause
Wisconsin v. Yoder clause1st Amendment Free Exercise Clause
Tinker v. Des Moines clause
Citizens United v. FEC clause1st Amendment freedom of speech
US v. Lopez ruling5:4 for Lopez, the state cannot regulate guns on school property under the commerce clause
Shaw v. Reno clause
Marbury v. Madison ruling4:0 for Marbury, kinda. Marbury does deserve his commision, but SCOTUS shouldn't have heard the case first
Roe v. Wade impactExtended the right of privacy to a woman's right to an abortion
Tinker v. Des Moines impact
McCulloch v. Maryland factsMaryland tried to tax federal banks in the state, McCulloch, the chief cashier in the Baltimore branch refused to pay. the state sued. (1819)
US v. Lopez impactlimited commerce clause, lessened federal power
Baker v. Carr question
protected freedom of press, government cannot stop printing
Wisconsin v. Yoder questionDid Wisconsin's requirement that all parents send their children to school at until age 16 violate the First Amendment's free exercise clause?
Gideon v. Wainwright clause
Shaw v. Reno factsIn an attempt to create an additional legislative district with a majority of African-American voters, the state of North Carolina created a district connecting pockets of minority voters by nothing more than the width of the freeway. Shaw, a republican from NC, sued the US Attorney General who had forced the changes on 14th amendment violations (1993)
Schenck v. US factsDuring World War I, Schenck, secretary of the socialist party, mailed a pamphlets to draftees declaring that the Thirteenth Amendment prohibition against involuntary servitude meant that the draft was unconstitutional. He was charged with violation of the Espionage Act and sued saying that he was just exercising free speech (1919)
Engel v. Vitale impact
McDonald v. Chicago questionDoes the 2nd Amendment apply to state and local governments through the 14th Amendment's due process clause and thus prevent states from banning gun ownership?
New York Times v. US clause1st amendment freedom of press
Does redrawing district lines based solely on race violate the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment?
Boost!
Boost!
6:3 for NYTimes, except in the case of a Clear and Present danger the US government does not have the power of prior restraint over the press
US v. Lopez ruling5:4 for Lopez, the state cannot regulate guns on school property under the commerce clause
Citizens United v. FEC impactused as precedent to declare the cap on campaign funding unconstitutional, now money=free speech
Gideon v. Wainwright clause6th amendment, right to an attorney
6:2 for Baker, SCOTUS has the power to rule on congressional districts
Roe v. Wade factsRoe, a Texas resident, sought to terminate her pregnancy by abortion. Texas law prohibited abortions except to save the pregnant woman's life, Roe sued "on behalf of all women" (1973)
14th amendment equal protection clause
Frozen!
Frozen!
Roe v. Wade clause
McDonald v. Chicago clause
New York Times v. US factsThe Nixon administration attempted to prevent several newspapers from publishing materials belonging to a classified Defense Department study, known as the Pentagon Papers, detailing US actions in Vietnam. The president argued that prior restraint was necessary to protect national security. NYTimes sued on 1st amendment grounds (1971)
Extended the right of privacy to a woman's right to an abortion
Public schools in New York began the school day by having students to recite a nondenominational prayer each morning. Engel, a parent at the school sued the district for violating the establishment clause (1962)
McDonald v. Chicago questionDoes the 2nd Amendment apply to state and local governments through the 14th Amendment's due process clause and thus prevent states from banning gun ownership?
Schenck v. US impactuntil it was overturned decades later, Schenck v. US was used to uphold the Espionage Act, causing many other convictions
McCulloch v. Maryland impactestablished supremacy of federal laws and the implied powers of congress
Do the plaintiffs have a right to their commissions?
4:0 for Marbury, kinda. Marbury does deserve his commision, but SCOTUS shouldn't have heard the case first
Gideon v. Wainwright ruling
Tinker v. Des Moines ruling
1st Amendment Establishment Clause
Commerce Clause
Gideon v. Wainwright facts
Frozen!
Frozen!
Wisconsin v. Yoder ruling7:0 for Yoder, forcing people to go to school despite a religious disagreement violated the free exercise clause
The Chicago system for obtaining gun permits was so annoying that it was almost impossible to obtain one. McDonald sued Chicago for violating his 2nd amendment rights (2010)
Citizens United v. FEC factsBCRA law banned Citizens United from showing an ad they made casting Hilary Clinton in a negative light calling it "electioneering" and thus against the BCRA. Citizens United appealed that the ad fell under their right to free speech and thus the BCRA was unconstitutional (2010)
Citizens United v. FEC clause1st Amendment freedom of speech
US v. Lopez impactlimited commerce clause, lessened federal power
Schenck v. US question
Marbury V. Madison impactestablished judicial review