Citizens United v. FEC facts BCRA law banned Citizens United from showing an ad they made casting Hilary Clinton in a negative light calling it "electioneering" and thus against the BCRA. Citizens United appealed that the ad fell under their right to free speech and thus the BCRA was unconstitutional (2010)
Frozen!
Frozen!
Boost!
Boost!
Roe v. Wade clause a bunch, 9th implied rights, 14th due process especially
New York Times v. US ruling 6:3 for NYTimes, except in the case of a Clear and Present danger the US government does not have the power of prior restraint over the press
religion trumps schooling
Brown v. Board of Education question
Tinker v. Des Moines ruling
McDonald v. Chicago ruling 5:4 for McDonald, the right to bear arms applies to the states
Baker v. Carr question Can the supreme court rule on issues of legislative districts?
US v. Lopez ruling 5:4 for Lopez, the state cannot regulate guns on school property under the commerce clause
US v. Lopez question
Gideon v. Wainwright impact Guaranteed the right to an attorney for the poor or indigent in a state felony case
Shaw v. Reno facts In an attempt to create an additional legislative district with a majority of African-American voters, the state of North Carolina created a district connecting pockets of minority voters by nothing more than the width of the freeway. Shaw, a republican from NC, sued the US Attorney General who had forced the changes on 14th amendment violations (1993)
Does the Texas laws banning abortions violate the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment and a woman's constitutional right to an abortion?
Frozen!
Frozen!
Schenck v. US facts During World War I, Schenck, secretary of the socialist party, mailed a pamphlets to draftees declaring that the Thirteenth Amendment prohibition against involuntary servitude meant that the draft was unconstitutional. He was charged with violation of the Espionage Act and sued saying that he was just exercising free speech (1919)
Wisconsin v. Yoder question
14th amendment equal protection clause
Marbury V. Madison impact established judicial review
Wisconsin v. Yoder clause
Baker v. Carr clause 14th amendment equal protection clause
Tinker v. Des Moines question Does banning the wearing of armbands in public school, as a form of protest, violate the students' freedom of speech guaranteed in the First Amendment?
Schenck v. US clause 1st Amendment freedom of speech
Does the 2nd Amendment apply to state and local governments through the 14th Amendment's due process clause and thus prevent states from banning gun ownership?
McCulloch v. Maryland clause
Wisconsin v. Yoder facts For religious reasons Amish families refused to send their children to high school citing a religious exemption, violating a Wisconsin law and were fined. They sued the state for violating their freedom of religion (1972)
McDonald v. Chicago clause 2nd Amendment right to bear arms, 14th amendment due process clause
used as precedent to declare the cap on campaign funding unconstitutional, now money=free speech
Maryland tried to tax federal banks in the state, McCulloch, the chief cashier in the Baltimore branch refused to pay. the state sued. (1819)
5:4 for Shaw, factoring race into redistricting is unconstitutional
Does the federal government have implied powers?
US v. Lopez facts
US v. Lopez ruling
Frozen!
Frozen!
Boost!
Boost!
Brown v. Board of Education impact overruled "sperate but equal" (from Plessy v. Ferguson) and gave legal precedent for desegregation
In an attempt to create an additional legislative district with a majority of African-American voters, the state of North Carolina created a district connecting pockets of minority voters by nothing more than the width of the freeway. Shaw, a republican from NC, sued the US Attorney General who had forced the changes on 14th amendment violations (1993)
9:0 for Brown, school segregation violates the equal protection clause
Marbury v. Madison ruling
Baker v. Carr ruling
Tinker v. Des Moines ruling
5:4 for McDonald, the right to bear arms applies to the states
Tinker v. Des Moines facts
Tinker v. Des Moines impact
Marbury V. Madison impact
Schenck v. US facts During World War I, Schenck, secretary of the socialist party, mailed a pamphlets to draftees declaring that the Thirteenth Amendment prohibition against involuntary servitude meant that the draft was unconstitutional. He was charged with violation of the Espionage Act and sued saying that he was just exercising free speech (1919)
7:2 for Roe, women have the right to an abortion
Frozen!
Frozen!
Citizens United v. FEC question
Engel v. Vitale facts
New York Times v. US question can the executive branch block the publication of classified government documents without violating the first amendment freedom of press clause?
Wisconsin v. Yoder clause 1st Amendment Free Exercise Clause
McCulloch v. Maryland facts
For religious reasons Amish families refused to send their children to high school citing a religious exemption, violating a Wisconsin law and were fined. They sued the state for violating their freedom of religion (1972)
Gideon v. Wainwright clause 6th amendment, right to an attorney
Citizens United v. FEC clause 1st Amendment freedom of speech
Tinker v. Des Moines question Does banning the wearing of armbands in public school, as a form of protest, violate the students' freedom of speech guaranteed in the First Amendment?
Does the federal government have implied powers?
US v. Lopez question Under the commerce clause, does congress have the power to regulate guns near schools?
Schenck v. US impact until it was overturned decades later, Schenck v. US was used to uphold the Espionage Act, causing many other convictions
Roe v. Wade clause a bunch, 9th implied rights, 14th due process especially
Schenck v. US question Did Schenck's conviction under the Espionage Act for criticizing the draft violate his freedom of speech?
Citizens United v. FEC impact
New York Times v. US ruling 6:3 for NYTimes, except in the case of a Clear and Present danger the US government does not have the power of prior restraint over the press
Shaw v. Reno impact claims of racial redistricting must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny. laws that results in classification by race must have a compelling state interest or a clear 14th amendment violation
Incorrect!
Incorrect!
Player 1 wins!

Player 2 wins!
×

End this game?

Splash Image

Duel!