Extended the right of privacy to a woman's right to an abortion
McCulloch v. Maryland questionDoes the federal government have implied powers?
Engel v. Vitale factsPublic schools in New York began the school day by having students to recite a nondenominational prayer each morning. Engel, a parent at the school sued the district for violating the establishment clause (1962)
Schenck v. US clause1st Amendment freedom of speech
New York Times v. US clause1st amendment freedom of press
Baker v. Carr questionCan the supreme court rule on issues of legislative districts?
New York Times v. US question
Shaw v. Reno clause14th amendment equal protection clause
Gideon v. Wainwright impactGuaranteed the right to an attorney for the poor or indigent in a state felony case
Citizens United v. FEC question
Engel v. Vitale clause1st Amendment Establishment Clause
Tinker v. Des Moines clausefree speech clause
Marbury v. Madison questionDo the plaintiffs have a right to their commissions?
Baker v. Carr clause
Schenck v. US questionDid Schenck's conviction under the Espionage Act for criticizing the draft violate his freedom of speech?
Gideon was convicted for a felony in florida where there were no state laws protecting right to an attorney. in prison he researched law and sued citing violations of his 6th amendment rights (1963)
McDonald v. Chicago impactstates cannot infringe on the right to bear arms
BCRA law banned Citizens United from showing an ad they made casting Hilary Clinton in a negative light calling it "electioneering" and thus against the BCRA. Citizens United appealed that the ad fell under their right to free speech and thus the BCRA was unconstitutional (2010)
McDonald v. Chicago factsThe Chicago system for obtaining gun permits was so annoying that it was almost impossible to obtain one. McDonald sued Chicago for violating his 2nd amendment rights (2010)
Engel v. Vitale question
Frozen!
Frozen!
Roe v. Wade questionDoes the Texas laws banning abortions violate the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment and a woman's constitutional right to an abortion?
Marbury v. Madison ruling
1st Amendment freedom of speech
Frozen!
Frozen!
Shaw v. Reno impact
US v. Lopez ruling5:4 for Lopez, the state cannot regulate guns on school property under the commerce clause
Boost!
Boost!
In Tennessee district boundaries were not being redrawn despite unequal spread of voters. Baker, a Tennessee citizen, sued on the grounds that the district lines made rural votes worth more than urban ones. (1962)
Schenck v. US impactuntil it was overturned decades later, Schenck v. US was used to uphold the Espionage Act, causing many other convictions
New York Times v. US ruling6:3 for NYTimes, except in the case of a Clear and Present danger the US government does not have the power of prior restraint over the press
In an attempt to create an additional legislative district with a majority of African-American voters, the state of North Carolina created a district connecting pockets of minority voters by nothing more than the width of the freeway. Shaw, a republican from NC, sued the US Attorney General who had forced the changes on 14th amendment violations (1993)
McCulloch v. Maryland impactestablished supremacy of federal laws and the implied powers of congress
Boost!
Boost!
Roe v. Wade questionDoes the Texas laws banning abortions violate the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment and a woman's constitutional right to an abortion?
The Chicago system for obtaining gun permits was so annoying that it was almost impossible to obtain one. McDonald sued Chicago for violating his 2nd amendment rights (2010)
Engel v. Vitale ruling6:1 for Engel, since it was a public school, it does violate the establishment clause
Citizens United v. FEC clause
until it was overturned decades later, Schenck v. US was used to uphold the Espionage Act, causing many other convictions
US v. Lopez facts
US v. Lopez impact
Tinker v. Des Moines questionDoes banning the wearing of armbands in public school, as a form of protest, violate the students' freedom of speech guaranteed in the First Amendment?
Brown v. Board of Education impact
Roe v. Wade clausea bunch, 9th implied rights, 14th due process especially
Boost!
Boost!
1st Amendment freedom of speech
Brown v. Board of Education ruling9:0 for Brown, school segregation violates the equal protection clause
New York Times v. US questioncan the executive branch block the publication of classified government documents without violating the first amendment freedom of press clause?
5:4 for McDonald, the right to bear arms applies to the states
1st Amendment Establishment Clause
Brown was a student at a Topeka school. She had to travel much farther to the nearest black school than she would to the white one. With support from the NAACP Brown sued (1954
Engel v. Vitale impact
Baker v. Carr clause
Baker v. Carr facts
unanimous for US, Schenck's encouragement of draft dodging was a clear and present danger
Frozen!
Frozen!
7:0 for Yoder, forcing people to go to school despite a religious disagreement violated the free exercise clause
McDonald v. Chicago clause2nd Amendment right to bear arms, 14th amendment due process clause
Shaw v. Reno factsIn an attempt to create an additional legislative district with a majority of African-American voters, the state of North Carolina created a district connecting pockets of minority voters by nothing more than the width of the freeway. Shaw, a republican from NC, sued the US Attorney General who had forced the changes on 14th amendment violations (1993)
Frozen!
Frozen!
Schenck v. US questionDid Schenck's conviction under the Espionage Act for criticizing the draft violate his freedom of speech?
Boost!
Boost!
5:4 for Lopez, the state cannot regulate guns on school property under the commerce clause
Wisconsin v. Yoder factsFor religious reasons Amish families refused to send their children to high school citing a religious exemption, violating a Wisconsin law and were fined. They sued the state for violating their freedom of religion (1972)
4:0 for Marbury, kinda. Marbury does deserve his commision, but SCOTUS shouldn't have heard the case first