New York Times v. US factsThe Nixon administration attempted to prevent several newspapers from publishing materials belonging to a classified Defense Department study, known as the Pentagon Papers, detailing US actions in Vietnam. The president argued that prior restraint was necessary to protect national security. NYTimes sued on 1st amendment grounds (1971)
Frozen!
Frozen!
Boost!
Boost!
Gideon v. Wainwright impactGuaranteed the right to an attorney for the poor or indigent in a state felony case
Shaw v. Reno clause14th amendment equal protection clause
Schenck v. US questionDid Schenck's conviction under the Espionage Act for criticizing the draft violate his freedom of speech?
Marbury v. Madison clauseappellate jurisdiction clause of Article III
McDonald v. Chicago ruling5:4 for McDonald, the right to bear arms applies to the states
Tinker v. Des Moines factsStudents were suspended for wearing black armbands as a symbol to protest the Vietnam War after being told that wearing the armbands would result in punishment. Their parents sued the school system for violating the students right to free speech (1969)
Marbury v. Madison ruling4:0 for Marbury, kinda. Marbury does deserve his commision, but SCOTUS shouldn't have heard the case first
In an attempt to create an additional legislative district with a majority of African-American voters, the state of North Carolina created a district connecting pockets of minority voters by nothing more than the width of the freeway. Shaw, a republican from NC, sued the US Attorney General who had forced the changes on 14th amendment violations (1993)
McCulloch v. Maryland impact
protected freedom of press, government cannot stop printing
unanimous for McCulloch, the federal government has implied powers, states can't tax a federal institution
Wisconsin v. Yoder question
7:2 for Tinker, symbolic speech is protected under freedom of speech, students have free speech rights
used as precedent to declare the cap on campaign funding unconstitutional, now money=free speech
Citizens United v. FEC clause
Roe v. Wade clausea bunch, 9th implied rights, 14th due process especially
Brown v. Board of Education ruling9:0 for Brown, school segregation violates the equal protection clause
Citizens United v. FEC facts
Wisconsin v. Yoder impact
1st Amendment Establishment Clause
US v. Lopez ruling5:4 for Lopez, the state cannot regulate guns on school property under the commerce clause
McDonald v. Chicago question
New York Times v. US ruling6:3 for NYTimes, except in the case of a Clear and Present danger the US government does not have the power of prior restraint over the press
Gideon v. Wainwright clause6th amendment, right to an attorney
Roe v. Wade questionDoes the Texas laws banning abortions violate the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment and a woman's constitutional right to an abortion?
2nd Amendment right to bear arms, 14th amendment due process clause
Engel v. Vitale ruling6:1 for Engel, since it was a public school, it does violate the establishment clause
Roe v. Wade facts
Extended the right of privacy to a woman's right to an abortion
Marbury v. Madison ruling4:0 for Marbury, kinda. Marbury does deserve his commision, but SCOTUS shouldn't have heard the case first
Boost!
Boost!
Brown v. Board of Education facts
McCulloch v. Maryland rulingunanimous for McCulloch, the federal government has implied powers, states can't tax a federal institution
US v. Lopez clause
Citizens United v. FEC questionDoes a law that limits the ability of corporations and labor unions to spend their own money to advocate the election or defeat of a candidate violate the First Amendment's guarantee of free speech?
Wisconsin v. Yoder questionDid Wisconsin's requirement that all parents send their children to school at until age 16 violate the First Amendment's free exercise clause?
Wisconsin v. Yoder ruling7:0 for Yoder, forcing people to go to school despite a religious disagreement violated the free exercise clause
1st Amendment Establishment Clause
McDonald v. Chicago factsThe Chicago system for obtaining gun permits was so annoying that it was almost impossible to obtain one. McDonald sued Chicago for violating his 2nd amendment rights (2010)
Roe v. Wade impact
5:4 for McDonald, the right to bear arms applies to the states
New York Times v. US factsThe Nixon administration attempted to prevent several newspapers from publishing materials belonging to a classified Defense Department study, known as the Pentagon Papers, detailing US actions in Vietnam. The president argued that prior restraint was necessary to protect national security. NYTimes sued on 1st amendment grounds (1971)
5:4 for Citizens United, political ads by corporations/nonprofits are protected under free speech, giving money to a campaign doesn't necessarily mean that they will be biased towards you
Frozen!
Frozen!
Roe v. Wade questionDoes the Texas laws banning abortions violate the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment and a woman's constitutional right to an abortion?
6:3 for NYTimes, except in the case of a Clear and Present danger the US government does not have the power of prior restraint over the press
McDonald v. Chicago question
Engel v. Vitale ruling6:1 for Engel, since it was a public school, it does violate the establishment clause
1st amendment freedom of press
Frozen!
Frozen!
New York Times v. US question
Brown v. Board of Education clause14th amendment equal protection clause
McCulloch v. Maryland questionDoes the federal government have implied powers?
claims of racial redistricting must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny. laws that results in classification by race must have a compelling state interest or a clear 14th amendment violation
students have free speech rights, symbolic speech is speech and protected
Shaw v. Reno questionDoes redrawing district lines based solely on race violate the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment?
Gideon v. Wainwright facts
Shaw v. Reno clause14th amendment equal protection clause
Baker v. Carr factsIn Tennessee district boundaries were not being redrawn despite unequal spread of voters. Baker, a Tennessee citizen, sued on the grounds that the district lines made rural votes worth more than urban ones. (1962)
until it was overturned decades later, Schenck v. US was used to uphold the Espionage Act, causing many other convictions
Can the supreme court rule on issues of legislative districts?
Baker v. Carr ruling6:2 for Baker, SCOTUS has the power to rule on congressional districts