a bunch, 9th implied rights, 14th due process especially
Frozen!
Frozen!
Boost!
Boost!
Maryland tried to tax federal banks in the state, McCulloch, the chief cashier in the Baltimore branch refused to pay. the state sued. (1819)
Brown v. Board of Education question
Gideon v. Wainwright impactGuaranteed the right to an attorney for the poor or indigent in a state felony case
Extended the right of privacy to a woman's right to an abortion
Marbury v. Madison ruling4:0 for Marbury, kinda. Marbury does deserve his commision, but SCOTUS shouldn't have heard the case first
5:4 for Citizens United, political ads by corporations/nonprofits are protected under free speech, giving money to a campaign doesn't necessarily mean that they will be biased towards you
Tinker v. Des Moines questionDoes banning the wearing of armbands in public school, as a form of protest, violate the students' freedom of speech guaranteed in the First Amendment?
1st Amendment Establishment Clause
US v. Lopez question
The Chicago system for obtaining gun permits was so annoying that it was almost impossible to obtain one. McDonald sued Chicago for violating his 2nd amendment rights (2010)
McDonald v. Chicago question
Boost!
Boost!
claims of racial redistricting must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny. laws that results in classification by race must have a compelling state interest or a clear 14th amendment violation
New York Times v. US questioncan the executive branch block the publication of classified government documents without violating the first amendment freedom of press clause?
Roe v. Wade question
US v. Lopez impactlimited commerce clause, lessened federal power
Lopez, a senior brought a gun to his public high school, illegal under the federal Gun Free School Zones Act. He was arrested and tried in federal court. He sued saying that regulation on state property (schools) was state business. (1995)
McCulloch v. Maryland clause
9:0 for Brown, school segregation violates the equal protection clause
McDonald v. Chicago ruling5:4 for McDonald, the right to bear arms applies to the states
Marbury v. Madison questionDo the plaintiffs have a right to their commissions?
Tinker v. Des Moines clause
overruled "sperate but equal" (from Plessy v. Ferguson) and gave legal precedent for desegregation
Baker v. Carr questionCan the supreme court rule on issues of legislative districts?
US v. Lopez clause
Gideon v. Wainwright clause6th amendment, right to an attorney
New York Times v. US ruling6:3 for NYTimes, except in the case of a Clear and Present danger the US government does not have the power of prior restraint over the press
Baker v. Carr impactestablishes One Person-One Vote principle which expands the rights of minorities
Baker v. Carr facts
used as precedent to declare the cap on campaign funding unconstitutional, now money=free speech
Does redrawing district lines based solely on race violate the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment?
Frozen!
Frozen!
Boost!
Boost!
1st amendment freedom of press
Roe v. Wade clausea bunch, 9th implied rights, 14th due process especially
Public schools in New York began the school day by having students to recite a nondenominational prayer each morning. Engel, a parent at the school sued the district for violating the establishment clause (1962)
McCulloch v. Maryland facts
The Nixon administration attempted to prevent several newspapers from publishing materials belonging to a classified Defense Department study, known as the Pentagon Papers, detailing US actions in Vietnam. The president argued that prior restraint was necessary to protect national security. NYTimes sued on 1st amendment grounds (1971)
McCulloch v. Maryland question
The Chicago system for obtaining gun permits was so annoying that it was almost impossible to obtain one. McDonald sued Chicago for violating his 2nd amendment rights (2010)
2nd Amendment right to bear arms, 14th amendment due process clause
Shaw v. Reno clause14th amendment equal protection clause
Tinker v. Des Moines impactstudents have free speech rights, symbolic speech is speech and protected
New York Times v. US ruling
Boost!
Boost!
5:4 for Citizens United, political ads by corporations/nonprofits are protected under free speech, giving money to a campaign doesn't necessarily mean that they will be biased towards you
Citizens United v. FEC clause1st Amendment freedom of speech
Wisconsin v. Yoder factsFor religious reasons Amish families refused to send their children to high school citing a religious exemption, violating a Wisconsin law and were fined. They sued the state for violating their freedom of religion (1972)
Wisconsin v. Yoder clause
Brown v. Board of Education ruling9:0 for Brown, school segregation violates the equal protection clause
Baker v. Carr ruling6:2 for Baker, SCOTUS has the power to rule on congressional districts
Brown was a student at a Topeka school. She had to travel much farther to the nearest black school than she would to the white one. With support from the NAACP Brown sued (1954
Schenck v. US clause1st Amendment freedom of speech
Roe v. Wade ruling
claims of racial redistricting must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny. laws that results in classification by race must have a compelling state interest or a clear 14th amendment violation
Gideon v. Wainwright impactGuaranteed the right to an attorney for the poor or indigent in a state felony case
Engel v. Vitale clause1st Amendment Establishment Clause
Tinker v. Des Moines ruling7:2 for Tinker, symbolic speech is protected under freedom of speech, students have free speech rights
Citizens United v. FEC impactused as precedent to declare the cap on campaign funding unconstitutional, now money=free speech
Roe, a Texas resident, sought to terminate her pregnancy by abortion. Texas law prohibited abortions except to save the pregnant woman's life, Roe sued "on behalf of all women" (1973)
US v. Lopez ruling5:4 for Lopez, the state cannot regulate guns on school property under the commerce clause
Under the commerce clause, does congress have the power to regulate guns near schools?
Do the plaintiffs have a right to their commissions?