Marbury v. Madison ruling4:0 for Marbury, kinda. Marbury does deserve his commision, but SCOTUS shouldn't have heard the case first
Frozen!
Frozen!
Boost!
Boost!
Baker v. Carr impact
US v. Lopez clauseCommerce Clause
claims of racial redistricting must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny. laws that results in classification by race must have a compelling state interest or a clear 14th amendment violation
Engel v. Vitale impactSchool sponsorship of religious activities violates the establishment clause
Gideon v. Wainwright factsGideon was convicted for a felony in florida where there were no state laws protecting right to an attorney. in prison he researched law and sued citing violations of his 6th amendment rights (1963)
Engel v. Vitale clause1st Amendment Establishment Clause
Brown v. Board of Education impactoverruled "sperate but equal" (from Plessy v. Ferguson) and gave legal precedent for desegregation
New York Times v. US clause
US v. Lopez factsLopez, a senior brought a gun to his public high school, illegal under the federal Gun Free School Zones Act. He was arrested and tried in federal court. He sued saying that regulation on state property (schools) was state business. (1995)
Wisconsin v. Yoder impactreligion trumps schooling
Roe, a Texas resident, sought to terminate her pregnancy by abortion. Texas law prohibited abortions except to save the pregnant woman's life, Roe sued "on behalf of all women" (1973)
Gideon v. Wainwright clause6th amendment, right to an attorney
McDonald v. Chicago impactstates cannot infringe on the right to bear arms
Tinker v. Des Moines clausefree speech clause
Roe v. Wade question
1st Amendment freedom of speech
Marbury v. Madison clauseappellate jurisdiction clause of Article III
Tinker v. Des Moines impactstudents have free speech rights, symbolic speech is speech and protected
Frozen!
Frozen!
McDonald v. Chicago questionDoes the 2nd Amendment apply to state and local governments through the 14th Amendment's due process clause and thus prevent states from banning gun ownership?
Citizens United v. FEC questionDoes a law that limits the ability of corporations and labor unions to spend their own money to advocate the election or defeat of a candidate violate the First Amendment's guarantee of free speech?
New York Times v. US factsThe Nixon administration attempted to prevent several newspapers from publishing materials belonging to a classified Defense Department study, known as the Pentagon Papers, detailing US actions in Vietnam. The president argued that prior restraint was necessary to protect national security. NYTimes sued on 1st amendment grounds (1971)
Did Schenck's conviction under the Espionage Act for criticizing the draft violate his freedom of speech?
Shaw v. Reno facts
4:0 for Marbury, kinda. Marbury does deserve his commision, but SCOTUS shouldn't have heard the case first
Gideon v. Wainwright rulingunanimous for Gideon, the right to an attorney applies to felony cases
Citizens United v. FEC factsBCRA law banned Citizens United from showing an ad they made casting Hilary Clinton in a negative light calling it "electioneering" and thus against the BCRA. Citizens United appealed that the ad fell under their right to free speech and thus the BCRA was unconstitutional (2010)
New York Times v. US ruling
New York Times v. US impactprotected freedom of press, government cannot stop printing
Engel v. Vitale factsPublic schools in New York began the school day by having students to recite a nondenominational prayer each morning. Engel, a parent at the school sued the district for violating the establishment clause (1962)
Marbury V. Madison impact
Frozen!
Frozen!
Boost!
Boost!
McCulloch v. Maryland impactestablished supremacy of federal laws and the implied powers of congress
Shaw v. Reno ruling5:4 for Shaw, factoring race into redistricting is unconstitutional
Brown v. Board of Education questionDo state school segregation laws violate the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment?
a bunch, 9th implied rights, 14th due process especially
In Tennessee district boundaries were not being redrawn despite unequal spread of voters. Baker, a Tennessee citizen, sued on the grounds that the district lines made rural votes worth more than urban ones. (1962)
Tinker v. Des Moines ruling7:2 for Tinker, symbolic speech is protected under freedom of speech, students have free speech rights
Citizens United v. FEC ruling5:4 for Citizens United, political ads by corporations/nonprofits are protected under free speech, giving money to a campaign doesn't necessarily mean that they will be biased towards you
US v. Lopez clause
Marbury v. Madison questionDo the plaintiffs have a right to their commissions?
McDonald v. Chicago clause
Roe v. Wade impactExtended the right of privacy to a woman's right to an abortion
Wisconsin v. Yoder questionDid Wisconsin's requirement that all parents send their children to school at until age 16 violate the First Amendment's free exercise clause?
Schenck v. US impact
Brown was a student at a Topeka school. She had to travel much farther to the nearest black school than she would to the white one. With support from the NAACP Brown sued (1954
McDonald v. Chicago ruling
Tinker v. Des Moines impactstudents have free speech rights, symbolic speech is speech and protected
Shaw v. Reno question
McDonald v. Chicago question
Frozen!
Frozen!
Engel v. Vitale impact
New York Times v. US questioncan the executive branch block the publication of classified government documents without violating the first amendment freedom of press clause?
Wisconsin v. Yoder ruling7:0 for Yoder, forcing people to go to school despite a religious disagreement violated the free exercise clause
Citizens United v. FEC clause1st Amendment freedom of speech
14th amendment equal protection clause
Tinker v. Des Moines clausefree speech clause
Baker v. Carr impact
Shaw v. Reno impactclaims of racial redistricting must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny. laws that results in classification by race must have a compelling state interest or a clear 14th amendment violation
McDonald v. Chicago impactstates cannot infringe on the right to bear arms