Shaw v. Reno impactclaims of racial redistricting must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny. laws that results in classification by race must have a compelling state interest or a clear 14th amendment violation
Boost!
Boost!
During World War I, Schenck, secretary of the socialist party, mailed a pamphlets to draftees declaring that the Thirteenth Amendment prohibition against involuntary servitude meant that the draft was unconstitutional. He was charged with violation of the Espionage Act and sued saying that he was just exercising free speech (1919)
Wisconsin v. Yoder ruling7:0 for Yoder, forcing people to go to school despite a religious disagreement violated the free exercise clause
Marbury V. Madison impactestablished judicial review
Marbury v. Madison clauseappellate jurisdiction clause of Article III
Frozen!
Frozen!
Marbury v. Madison questionDo the plaintiffs have a right to their commissions?
McCulloch v. Maryland impactestablished supremacy of federal laws and the implied powers of congress
Wisconsin v. Yoder impactreligion trumps schooling
Marbury v. Madison ruling4:0 for Marbury, kinda. Marbury does deserve his commision, but SCOTUS shouldn't have heard the case first
free speech clause
limited commerce clause, lessened federal power
6:2 for Baker, SCOTUS has the power to rule on congressional districts
McDonald v. Chicago question
Did Wisconsin's requirement that all parents send their children to school at until age 16 violate the First Amendment's free exercise clause?
14th amendment equal protection clause
overruled "sperate but equal" (from Plessy v. Ferguson) and gave legal precedent for desegregation
9:0 for Brown, school segregation violates the equal protection clause
a bunch, 9th implied rights, 14th due process especially
McDonald v. Chicago clause2nd Amendment right to bear arms, 14th amendment due process clause
McCulloch v. Maryland clause
Frozen!
Frozen!
used as precedent to declare the cap on campaign funding unconstitutional, now money=free speech
Marbury v. Madison ruling4:0 for Marbury, kinda. Marbury does deserve his commision, but SCOTUS shouldn't have heard the case first
Citizens United v. FEC clause1st Amendment freedom of speech
Baker v. Carr question
6:3 for NYTimes, except in the case of a Clear and Present danger the US government does not have the power of prior restraint over the press
Engel v. Vitale question
Gideon v. Wainwright factsGideon was convicted for a felony in florida where there were no state laws protecting right to an attorney. in prison he researched law and sued citing violations of his 6th amendment rights (1963)
unanimous for Gideon, the right to an attorney applies to felony cases
School sponsorship of religious activities violates the establishment clause
Shaw v. Reno clause14th amendment equal protection clause
Citizens United v. FEC impact
a bunch, 9th implied rights, 14th due process especially
7:2 for Roe, women have the right to an abortion
Frozen!
Frozen!
McCulloch v. Maryland questionDoes the federal government have implied powers?
Brown v. Board of Education clause14th amendment equal protection clause
Roe v. Wade questionDoes the Texas laws banning abortions violate the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment and a woman's constitutional right to an abortion?
Boost!
Boost!
Do the plaintiffs have a right to their commissions?
1st Amendment Establishment Clause
Baker v. Carr clause14th amendment equal protection clause
US v. Lopez clauseCommerce Clause
McDonald v. Chicago impact
Shaw v. Reno clause
Schenck v. US rulingunanimous for US, Schenck's encouragement of draft dodging was a clear and present danger
Citizens United v. FEC ruling
unanimous for McCulloch, the federal government has implied powers, states can't tax a federal institution
Did Wisconsin's requirement that all parents send their children to school at until age 16 violate the First Amendment's free exercise clause?
McCulloch v. Maryland clause
Wisconsin v. Yoder impactreligion trumps schooling
The Nixon administration attempted to prevent several newspapers from publishing materials belonging to a classified Defense Department study, known as the Pentagon Papers, detailing US actions in Vietnam. The president argued that prior restraint was necessary to protect national security. NYTimes sued on 1st amendment grounds (1971)
Shaw v. Reno factsIn an attempt to create an additional legislative district with a majority of African-American voters, the state of North Carolina created a district connecting pockets of minority voters by nothing more than the width of the freeway. Shaw, a republican from NC, sued the US Attorney General who had forced the changes on 14th amendment violations (1993)
US v. Lopez ruling5:4 for Lopez, the state cannot regulate guns on school property under the commerce clause
Schenck v. US impactuntil it was overturned decades later, Schenck v. US was used to uphold the Espionage Act, causing many other convictions
Tinker v. Des Moines ruling
Schenck v. US factsDuring World War I, Schenck, secretary of the socialist party, mailed a pamphlets to draftees declaring that the Thirteenth Amendment prohibition against involuntary servitude meant that the draft was unconstitutional. He was charged with violation of the Espionage Act and sued saying that he was just exercising free speech (1919)
Boost!
Boost!
Roe v. Wade factsRoe, a Texas resident, sought to terminate her pregnancy by abortion. Texas law prohibited abortions except to save the pregnant woman's life, Roe sued "on behalf of all women" (1973)
Frozen!
Frozen!
McDonald v. Chicago questionDoes the 2nd Amendment apply to state and local governments through the 14th Amendment's due process clause and thus prevent states from banning gun ownership?
Baker v. Carr question
Gideon v. Wainwright factsGideon was convicted for a felony in florida where there were no state laws protecting right to an attorney. in prison he researched law and sued citing violations of his 6th amendment rights (1963)
McCulloch v. Maryland factsMaryland tried to tax federal banks in the state, McCulloch, the chief cashier in the Baltimore branch refused to pay. the state sued. (1819)