Schenck v. US rulingunanimous for US, Schenck's encouragement of draft dodging was a clear and present danger
Gideon v. Wainwright clause
Roe v. Wade clause
5:4 for McDonald, the right to bear arms applies to the states
Tinker v. Des Moines impact
US v. Lopez clauseCommerce Clause
Marbury v. Madison ruling4:0 for Marbury, kinda. Marbury does deserve his commision, but SCOTUS shouldn't have heard the case first
Wisconsin v. Yoder impactreligion trumps schooling
Baker v. Carr factsIn Tennessee district boundaries were not being redrawn despite unequal spread of voters. Baker, a Tennessee citizen, sued on the grounds that the district lines made rural votes worth more than urban ones. (1962)
Wisconsin v. Yoder factsFor religious reasons Amish families refused to send their children to high school citing a religious exemption, violating a Wisconsin law and were fined. They sued the state for violating their freedom of religion (1972)
Gideon v. Wainwright impact
Citizens United v. FEC impact
Schenck v. US factsDuring World War I, Schenck, secretary of the socialist party, mailed a pamphlets to draftees declaring that the Thirteenth Amendment prohibition against involuntary servitude meant that the draft was unconstitutional. He was charged with violation of the Espionage Act and sued saying that he was just exercising free speech (1919)
Shaw v. Reno factsIn an attempt to create an additional legislative district with a majority of African-American voters, the state of North Carolina created a district connecting pockets of minority voters by nothing more than the width of the freeway. Shaw, a republican from NC, sued the US Attorney General who had forced the changes on 14th amendment violations (1993)
McDonald v. Chicago questionDoes the 2nd Amendment apply to state and local governments through the 14th Amendment's due process clause and thus prevent states from banning gun ownership?
Schenck v. US impactuntil it was overturned decades later, Schenck v. US was used to uphold the Espionage Act, causing many other convictions
Brown v. Board of Education impact
5:4 for Citizens United, political ads by corporations/nonprofits are protected under free speech, giving money to a campaign doesn't necessarily mean that they will be biased towards you
New York Times v. US clause
Roe v. Wade factsRoe, a Texas resident, sought to terminate her pregnancy by abortion. Texas law prohibited abortions except to save the pregnant woman's life, Roe sued "on behalf of all women" (1973)
1st Amendment Establishment Clause
US v. Lopez questionUnder the commerce clause, does congress have the power to regulate guns near schools?
Engel v. Vitale factsPublic schools in New York began the school day by having students to recite a nondenominational prayer each morning. Engel, a parent at the school sued the district for violating the establishment clause (1962)
Roe v. Wade impactExtended the right of privacy to a woman's right to an abortion
Baker v. Carr questionCan the supreme court rule on issues of legislative districts?
5:4 for Shaw, factoring race into redistricting is unconstitutional
Roe v. Wade question
1st Amendment Establishment Clause
Frozen!
Frozen!
Boost!
Boost!
Wisconsin v. Yoder facts
New York Times v. US impactprotected freedom of press, government cannot stop printing
Frozen!
Frozen!
Tinker v. Des Moines impact
Gideon v. Wainwright question
Roe v. Wade clausea bunch, 9th implied rights, 14th due process especially
McDonald v. Chicago ruling
McCulloch v. Maryland questionDoes the federal government have implied powers?
Engel v. Vitale impact
Gideon v. Wainwright rulingunanimous for Gideon, the right to an attorney applies to felony cases
Wisconsin v. Yoder questionDid Wisconsin's requirement that all parents send their children to school at until age 16 violate the First Amendment's free exercise clause?
Roe v. Wade facts
Tinker v. Des Moines factsStudents were suspended for wearing black armbands as a symbol to protest the Vietnam War after being told that wearing the armbands would result in punishment. Their parents sued the school system for violating the students right to free speech (1969)
Tinker v. Des Moines clausefree speech clause
McCulloch v. Maryland impactestablished supremacy of federal laws and the implied powers of congress
Wisconsin v. Yoder clause
1st Amendment freedom of speech
Baker v. Carr clause14th amendment equal protection clause
Marbury v. Madison questionDo the plaintiffs have a right to their commissions?
McDonald v. Chicago impactstates cannot infringe on the right to bear arms
Public schools in New York began the school day by having students to recite a nondenominational prayer each morning. Engel, a parent at the school sued the district for violating the establishment clause (1962)
5:4 for Shaw, factoring race into redistricting is unconstitutional
Baker v. Carr questionCan the supreme court rule on issues of legislative districts?
Tinker v. Des Moines ruling7:2 for Tinker, symbolic speech is protected under freedom of speech, students have free speech rights
Schenck v. US clause1st Amendment freedom of speech
Shaw v. Reno factsIn an attempt to create an additional legislative district with a majority of African-American voters, the state of North Carolina created a district connecting pockets of minority voters by nothing more than the width of the freeway. Shaw, a republican from NC, sued the US Attorney General who had forced the changes on 14th amendment violations (1993)
The Chicago system for obtaining gun permits was so annoying that it was almost impossible to obtain one. McDonald sued Chicago for violating his 2nd amendment rights (2010)
New York Times v. US ruling6:3 for NYTimes, except in the case of a Clear and Present danger the US government does not have the power of prior restraint over the press
McDonald v. Chicago clause2nd Amendment right to bear arms, 14th amendment due process clause
During World War I, Schenck, secretary of the socialist party, mailed a pamphlets to draftees declaring that the Thirteenth Amendment prohibition against involuntary servitude meant that the draft was unconstitutional. He was charged with violation of the Espionage Act and sued saying that he was just exercising free speech (1919)