McCulloch v. Maryland rulingunanimous for McCulloch, the federal government has implied powers, states can't tax a federal institution
Frozen!
Frozen!
Boost!
Boost!
New York Times v. US questioncan the executive branch block the publication of classified government documents without violating the first amendment freedom of press clause?
1st Amendment freedom of speech
McCulloch v. Maryland factsMaryland tried to tax federal banks in the state, McCulloch, the chief cashier in the Baltimore branch refused to pay. the state sued. (1819)
Marbury v. Madison question
Engel v. Vitale impact
Schenck v. US impactuntil it was overturned decades later, Schenck v. US was used to uphold the Espionage Act, causing many other convictions
Baker v. Carr clause
Does banning the wearing of armbands in public school, as a form of protest, violate the students' freedom of speech guaranteed in the First Amendment?
protected freedom of press, government cannot stop printing
New York Times v. US clause1st amendment freedom of press
1st Amendment Free Exercise Clause
Students were suspended for wearing black armbands as a symbol to protest the Vietnam War after being told that wearing the armbands would result in punishment. Their parents sued the school system for violating the students right to free speech (1969)
states cannot infringe on the right to bear arms
Baker v. Carr factsIn Tennessee district boundaries were not being redrawn despite unequal spread of voters. Baker, a Tennessee citizen, sued on the grounds that the district lines made rural votes worth more than urban ones. (1962)
Wisconsin v. Yoder facts
Gideon v. Wainwright questionDoes the 6th Amendment's right to counsel in criminal cases extend to defendants in state courts, even in cases in which the death penalty is not at issue?
Citizens United v. FEC questionDoes a law that limits the ability of corporations and labor unions to spend their own money to advocate the election or defeat of a candidate violate the First Amendment's guarantee of free speech?
Engel v. Vitale ruling
Baker v. Carr questionCan the supreme court rule on issues of legislative districts?
14th amendment equal protection clause
McCulloch v. Maryland questionDoes the federal government have implied powers?
4:0 for Marbury, kinda. Marbury does deserve his commision, but SCOTUS shouldn't have heard the case first
Citizens United v. FEC impact
McCulloch v. Maryland impactestablished supremacy of federal laws and the implied powers of congress
Citizens United v. FEC factsBCRA law banned Citizens United from showing an ad they made casting Hilary Clinton in a negative light calling it "electioneering" and thus against the BCRA. Citizens United appealed that the ad fell under their right to free speech and thus the BCRA was unconstitutional (2010)
Wisconsin v. Yoder impactreligion trumps schooling
Schenck v. US factsDuring World War I, Schenck, secretary of the socialist party, mailed a pamphlets to draftees declaring that the Thirteenth Amendment prohibition against involuntary servitude meant that the draft was unconstitutional. He was charged with violation of the Espionage Act and sued saying that he was just exercising free speech (1919)
Engel v. Vitale question
New York Times v. US ruling6:3 for NYTimes, except in the case of a Clear and Present danger the US government does not have the power of prior restraint over the press
New York Times v. US facts
Boost!
Boost!
Schenck v. US clause
Does redrawing district lines based solely on race violate the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment?
Brown v. Board of Education facts
Frozen!
Frozen!
In Tennessee district boundaries were not being redrawn despite unequal spread of voters. Baker, a Tennessee citizen, sued on the grounds that the district lines made rural votes worth more than urban ones. (1962)
Roe v. Wade clausea bunch, 9th implied rights, 14th due process especially
Marbury v. Madison ruling
Marbury v. Madison ruling4:0 for Marbury, kinda. Marbury does deserve his commision, but SCOTUS shouldn't have heard the case first
Shaw v. Reno impactclaims of racial redistricting must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny. laws that results in classification by race must have a compelling state interest or a clear 14th amendment violation
Students were suspended for wearing black armbands as a symbol to protest the Vietnam War after being told that wearing the armbands would result in punishment. Their parents sued the school system for violating the students right to free speech (1969)
New York Times v. US impactprotected freedom of press, government cannot stop printing
US v. Lopez factsLopez, a senior brought a gun to his public high school, illegal under the federal Gun Free School Zones Act. He was arrested and tried in federal court. He sued saying that regulation on state property (schools) was state business. (1995)
US v. Lopez ruling
Frozen!
Frozen!
6:3 for NYTimes, except in the case of a Clear and Present danger the US government does not have the power of prior restraint over the press
7:0 for Yoder, forcing people to go to school despite a religious disagreement violated the free exercise clause
Engel v. Vitale ruling
US v. Lopez question
McDonald v. Chicago impact
students have free speech rights, symbolic speech is speech and protected
Tinker v. Des Moines clausefree speech clause
Marbury v. Madison questionDo the plaintiffs have a right to their commissions?
Brown v. Board of Education clause14th amendment equal protection clause
Can the supreme court rule on issues of legislative districts?
Gideon v. Wainwright facts
Schenck v. US factsDuring World War I, Schenck, secretary of the socialist party, mailed a pamphlets to draftees declaring that the Thirteenth Amendment prohibition against involuntary servitude meant that the draft was unconstitutional. He was charged with violation of the Espionage Act and sued saying that he was just exercising free speech (1919)
Baker v. Carr impactestablishes One Person-One Vote principle which expands the rights of minorities
McDonald v. Chicago ruling5:4 for McDonald, the right to bear arms applies to the states
Schenck v. US question
unanimous for Gideon, the right to an attorney applies to felony cases
BCRA law banned Citizens United from showing an ad they made casting Hilary Clinton in a negative light calling it "electioneering" and thus against the BCRA. Citizens United appealed that the ad fell under their right to free speech and thus the BCRA was unconstitutional (2010)